FDA refusal charge LACKS FIRM: no manufacturer name

← All charge codes Labelling Dashboard

The LACKS FIRM charge appeared in 914 FDA import refusals between 2020 and 2026 — 3.5% of all 26,358 US import refusals. The charge is a labelling or registration failure, not a hazard found in the product. The origins cited most often are China, Mexico, India. The most-affected product category is Vitamins, Minerals, Proteins, and Unconventional Dietary Specialties for Humans. Volume in 2025 was down 7% on 2024.

Email me about new FDA import refusals involving the LACKS FIRM charge

What FDA's charge says

LACKS FIRM is the code FDA prints on a refusal; below is the charge language FDA publishes for it, quoted from its charge table, with the sections of the FD&C Act it cites.

The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(e)(1) of the FD&C Act in that the food is in package form and the label fails to bear the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor.

Sections 403(e)(1), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING

LACKS FIRM refusals by year

YearRefusalsYoY
2020111—
2021136+22.5%
2022104-23.5%
2023115+10.6%
2024179+55.7%
2025167-6.7%
2026102—YTD
Total914

Origins most often refused under LACKS FIRM

#Origin countryRefusals
1China144
2Mexico108
3India89
4Canada32
5Nigeria32
6Turkey28
7United Kingdom24
8Indonesia23
9Japan22
10Switzerland21
11Honduras18
12Vietnam16
13Germany15
14Hong Kong15
15Malaysia15
16Tanzania14
17Thailand13
18Guatemala12
19South Korea12
20Ecuador11
21Ghana10
22Haiti10
23Jordan10
24Netherlands9
25Sweden9
26Bangladesh8
27France8
28Pakistan8
29Taiwan8
30Afghanistan7

Product categories refused under LACKS FIRM

#Product categoryRefusals
1Vitamins, Minerals, Proteins, and Unconventional Dietary Specialties for Humans216
2Vegetables and Vegetable Products89
3Fishery/Seafood Products74
4Fruit and Fruit Products72
5Bakery Products, Doughs, Bakery Mixes, and Icings60
6Candy Without Chocolate, Candy Specialties, and Chewing Gum45
7Spices, Flavors, and Salts40
8Snack Food Items (Flour, Meal, or Vegetable Base)35
9Coffee and Tea34
10Dietary Conventional Foods and Meal Replacements33
11Soft Drinks and Waters30
12Chocolate and Cocoa Products24
13Nuts and Edible Seeds24
14Macaroni and Noodle Products21
15Baby (Infant and Junior) Food Products19

Latest refusals citing LACKS FIRM

About LACKS FIRM

What does the FDA import refusal charge LACKS FIRM mean?

FDA uses LACKS FIRM for: no manufacturer name. Its published charge language reads: “The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(e)(1) of the FD&C Act in that the food is in package form and the label fails to bear the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor.”

Is LACKS FIRM a food safety finding?

No. LACKS FIRM is a labelling or registration failure: the charge is about the label, the filing or the paperwork, not a hazard found in the product. A refusal citing it alone is counted as paperwork on this site.

What happens to a shipment refused under LACKS FIRM?

Under section 801(a) of the FD&C Act a refused entry has to be exported or destroyed, normally within 90 days of the notice of refusal. Bringing a product into compliance, for instance by relabelling, is something the importer asks FDA for before the decision is final. The notice itself and FDA's guidance govern a particular case; this page describes the published data and is not legal advice.