FDA refusal charge STD NAME: no standard name

← All charge codes Labelling Dashboard

The STD NAME charge appeared in 54 FDA import refusals between 2020 and 2026 — 0.2% of all 26,358 US import refusals. The charge is a labelling or registration failure, not a hazard found in the product. The origins cited most often are India, United Kingdom, China. The most-affected product category is Vitamins, Minerals, Proteins, and Unconventional Dietary Specialties for Humans. Volume in 2025 was up 67% on 2024.

Email me about new FDA import refusals involving the STD NAME charge

What FDA's charge says

STD NAME is the code FDA prints on a refusal; below is the charge language FDA publishes for it, quoted from its charge table, with the sections of the FD&C Act it cites.

The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(g)(2) of the FD&C Act in that the article purports to be or is represented as a food for which a definition and standard of identity have been prescribed by regulations as provided under Section 401 of the FD&C Act and the article is not labeled with the name specified in the definition and standard, or the label does not bear the common names of optional ingredients (other than spices, flavoring and coloring) present in such food, insofar as may be required by such regulation.

Sections 403(g)(2), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING

STD NAME refusals by year

YearRefusalsYoY
20205—
20213-40.0%
20226+100.0%
20237+16.7%
20249+28.6%
202515+66.7%
20269—YTD
Total54

Origins most often refused under STD NAME

#Origin countryRefusals
1India7
2United Kingdom7
3China5
4Guatemala4
5Canada3
6Honduras2
7Italy2
8Japan2
9Nigeria2
10Spain2
11Bangladesh1
12Cameroon1
13Dominican Republic1
14Ecuador1
15Guyana1
16Haiti1
17Hong Kong1
18Ivory Coast1
19Mexico1
20Myanmar1
21Pakistan1
22Philippines1
23South Africa1
24South Korea1
25Taiwan1
26Turkey1
27United Arab Emirates1
28Venezuela1

Product categories refused under STD NAME

#Product categoryRefusals
1Vitamins, Minerals, Proteins, and Unconventional Dietary Specialties for Humans16
2Baby (Infant and Junior) Food Products6
3Fruit and Fruit Products4
4Soft Drinks and Waters4
5Spices, Flavors, and Salts4
6Bakery Products, Doughs, Bakery Mixes, and Icings3
7Fishery/Seafood Products3
8Dietary Conventional Foods and Meal Replacements2
9Macaroni and Noodle Products2
10Milk, Butter, and Dried Milk Products2
11Alcoholic Beverages1
12Beverage Bases1
13Candy Without Chocolate, Candy Specialties, and Chewing Gum1
14Chocolate and Cocoa Products1
15Multiple Food Dinners, Gravies, Sauces, and Specialties (Total Diet)1

Latest refusals citing STD NAME

About STD NAME

What does the FDA import refusal charge STD NAME mean?

FDA uses STD NAME for: no standard name. Its published charge language reads: “The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(g)(2) of the FD&C Act in that the article purports to be or is represented as a food for which a definition and standard of identity have been prescribed by regulations as provided under Section 401 of the FD&C Act and the article is not labeled with the name specified in the definition and standard, or the label does not bear the common names of optional ingredients (other than spices, flavoring and coloring) present in such food, insofar as may be required by such regulation.”

Is STD NAME a food safety finding?

No. STD NAME is a labelling or registration failure: the charge is about the label, the filing or the paperwork, not a hazard found in the product. A refusal citing it alone is counted as paperwork on this site.

What happens to a shipment refused under STD NAME?

Under section 801(a) of the FD&C Act a refused entry has to be exported or destroyed, normally within 90 days of the notice of refusal. Bringing a product into compliance, for instance by relabelling, is something the importer asks FDA for before the decision is final. The notice itself and FDA's guidance govern a particular case; this page describes the published data and is not legal advice.