FDA refusal charge SULFITELBL: sulfites not declared

← All charge codes Labelling Dashboard

The SULFITELBL charge appeared in 107 FDA import refusals between 2020 and 2026 — 0.4% of all 26,358 US import refusals. The charge is a labelling or registration failure, not a hazard found in the product. The origins cited most often are Indonesia, India, Afghanistan. The most-affected product category is Fishery/Seafood Products. Volume in 2025 was up 538% on 2024.

Email me about new FDA import refusals involving the SULFITELBL charge

What FDA's charge says

SULFITELBL is the code FDA prints on a refusal; below is the charge language FDA publishes for it, quoted from its charge table, with the sections of the FD&C Act it cites.

The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded because 1) it appears to contain sulfites but the label fails to declare the presence of sulfites, a fact material to sulfite-sensitive individuals who must avoid the ingredient due to potential health consequences from its consumption, and 2) it appears the food is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the label does not list the common or usual name of each ingredient.

Sections 403(a)(1), 801(a)(3) ;MISBRANDING

SULFITELBL refusals by year

YearRefusalsYoY
202018—
20217-61.1%
202211+57.1%
20235-54.5%
20248+60.0%
202551+537.5%
20267—YTD
Total107

Origins most often refused under SULFITELBL

#Origin countryRefusals
1Indonesia30
2India16
3Afghanistan8
4China8
5Hong Kong6
6Mexico5
7Thailand5
8Canada4
9Japan4
10Vietnam3
11Algeria2
12Lebanon2
13Pakistan2
14South Korea2
15Turkey2
16Bangladesh1
17Cyprus1
18Iraq1
19Norway1
20Peru1
21Philippines1
22Russia1
23Taiwan1

Product categories refused under SULFITELBL

#Product categoryRefusals
1Fishery/Seafood Products32
2Fruit and Fruit Products30
3Vegetables and Vegetable Products17
4Spices, Flavors, and Salts8
5Bakery Products, Doughs, Bakery Mixes, and Icings3
6Nuts and Edible Seeds3
7Candy Without Chocolate, Candy Specialties, and Chewing Gum2
8Vitamins, Minerals, Proteins, and Unconventional Dietary Specialties for Humans2
9Chocolate and Cocoa Products1
10Dressings and Condiments1
11Egg and Egg Products1
12Filled Milk and Imitation Milk Products1
13Food Sweeteners (Nutritive)1
14Miscellaneous Food Related Items1
15Multiple Food Dinners, Gravies, Sauces, and Specialties (Total Diet)1

Latest refusals citing SULFITELBL

About SULFITELBL

What does the FDA import refusal charge SULFITELBL mean?

FDA uses SULFITELBL for: sulfites not declared. Its published charge language reads: “The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded because 1) it appears to contain sulfites but the label fails to declare the presence of sulfites, a fact material to sulfite-sensitive individuals who must avoid the ingredient due to potential health consequences from its consumption, and 2) it appears the food is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the label does not list the common or usual name of each ingredient.”

Is SULFITELBL a food safety finding?

No. SULFITELBL is a labelling or registration failure: the charge is about the label, the filing or the paperwork, not a hazard found in the product. A refusal citing it alone is counted as paperwork on this site.

What happens to a shipment refused under SULFITELBL?

Under section 801(a) of the FD&C Act a refused entry has to be exported or destroyed, normally within 90 days of the notice of refusal. Bringing a product into compliance, for instance by relabelling, is something the importer asks FDA for before the decision is final. The notice itself and FDA's guidance govern a particular case; this page describes the published data and is not legal advice.